UK Citizens Extradition Fight

January 5, 2010

IT consultant faces trial over OiNK file-sharing website

An IT consultant suspected of operating one of the world’s biggest pirate music websites from a bedsit will face trial today. Alan Ellis, 26, was arrested in 2007 as part of an Interpol-led operation to shut down a music file-sharing website which had attracted around 180,000 members.

Computer equipment and documents were seized from his Middlesbrough home in 2007 and he was charged with conspiracy to defraud the music industry and copyright infringement.

Police and music industry investigators suggested that he could have made hundreds of thousands of pounds a year from the OiNK website, which he set up in 2004. But Mr Ellis claimed the website was not illegal and that its purpose had been misunderstood.

The former IT consultant, who worked at Virgin Media’s contact centre in Stockton-on-Tees, has compared it to search engines such as Google which could also direct users to illegal music downloads. He is the first person in the UK ever to be charged with illegal file-sharing. He will go on trial at Middlesbrough Crown Court.

The OiNK website was a complex computer programme created to help share music and audio files amongst a community of online users.

Members of the community would “seed” the system by uploading music files or “leech” from it by downloading music files.

To do so they had to register their email address and a user name, then make donations by debit or credit card to ensure full access to the site.

The technology used – a method known as bit torrent file sharing – had three main advantages: It broke files down into small pieces of data, which made that data more easy to share, giving a higher quality download in a shorter time.

The beauty of the system was that each time a person leeched an album from the internet, they became a seeder from whom other OiNK users could download the same album.

Early online file sharing systems were so slow it could be more expensive to download an album than to buy it in a shop.

But advances in technology meant OiNK users could download very high quality music files, very quickly.

January 4, 2010

Gordon Brown promises full body scanners at UK airports

Filed under: News,Politics — Brian Howes @ 9:33 am
Tags: , , , , ,

Follow me on Twitter @Brian_Howes Click for my Twitter

Obama shouts and Gordon Brown does exactly what he is ordered to do! The threat this time, if you do not install the scanners US people will not use UK Airlines.

Airport body scanners on way – PM

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has given the go-ahead for full body scanners to be introduced at Britain’s airports.

BAA, which runs six UK airports, said it would now install the machines “as soon as is practical” at Heathrow.

Experts have questioned the scanners’ effectiveness at detecting the type of bomb allegedly used on Christmas Day in an attempted plane attack over Detroit.

BBC-News-Gordon-Brown-promises-full-body-scanners-at-UK-airports

BBC-News-Gordon-Brown-promises-full-body-scanners-at-UK-airports

This movie requires Adobe Flash for playback.

The US is also introducing tougher checks for air passengers from nations deemed to have links with terrorism.

Speaking on BBC One’s Andrew Marr show, the prime minister said the government would do everything in its power to tighten security and prevent a repeat of the US attack.

Hand luggage checks

Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who is now in custody, is accused of trying to detonate a bomb on a plane bound for the US.

Mr Brown said travellers would see the “gradual” introduction of the use of full body scanners and hand luggage checks for traces of explosives.

He added transit passengers as well as transfer passengers would undergo these checks.

Currently, not everyone has to pass through full body scanners already introduced at some major airports overseas – particularly if they are in transit from another country – due to concerns about cost and time delays.

A spokesman for BAA said: “It is our view that a combination of technology, intelligences and passenger profiling will help build a more robust defence against the unpredictable and changing nature of the terrorist threat to aviation.”

The spokesman said nothing had been decided yet on exactly which passengers would undergo the full body scans.

And he declined to give specific details about timing or comment on extending the use of scanners to other airports, costs or the potential for passenger delays.

‘Strip search’

The government’s move has been largely welcomed by the Liberal Democrats.

But home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne did say the scanners could have been rolled out sooner as they had been kept in storage since being trialled.

Meanwhile in the US, President Barack Obama promised “to act quickly to fix flaws” in the security system, and condemned lapses following the alleged Christmas Day bomb plot against a US plane.

Reports say people flying from Nigeria, Pakistan, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Yemen and Cuba will have pat-down body searches and have carry-on baggage searched.

The new US security directives will come into effect on Monday.

Philip Baum, editor of Aviation Security International, said scanners were not the only solution and profiling passengers was, in fact, the best way to prevent terrorist acts.

“We’ve got to face the fact that you can build a bomb in the duty free shop, after you’ve gone through screening. Bearing that in mind, we need to look at what people’s intent is, not what they are carrying on their person.”

On Friday, Gordon Brown announced he had ordered a review of existing security measures, and advisers are expected to report within days.

The £80,000 full body scanners, which produce “naked” images of passengers, remove the need for “pat down” searches.

They work by beaming electromagnetic waves on to passengers while they stand in a booth. A virtual three-dimensional image is then created from the reflected energy.

Some have voiced concerns about privacy, with campaigners saying they are tantamount to a “strip search”.

The machines are currently being trialled at Manchester airport following tests at Heathrow airport from 2004 to 2008.

They are also being rolled out across the US, with 40 machines used at 19 airports.

Gordon Brown the puppet of the US government!

On the shopping list of Obama is: Our brave UK troops that will fight where ever they are told and that is their job! Agreeing with all the US decisions is also expected! Handing over UK citizens without evidence no problem for Gordon Brown! Helping the US to torture suspected terrorists or anybody they want another Gordon Brown priority! Invading a country and killing over 100,000 innocent people in Iraq to please the US administration is no problem for UK Labour and Gordon Brown. They just pretended there was weapons of mass destruction and it OK! They the ngo on to steal the oil and charge to rebuild the country they had no right to destroy. How has this helped the people in Iraq? if being occupied without asking and living under the threat of the US and UK forced daily and is good, then the Iraq people will love it. Or maybe they should of had a say in being invaded Illegally?

January 1, 2010

Special relationship with UK stronger than ever, says US ambassador

Filed under: Gordon Brown,News,Politics — Brian Howes @ 10:35 pm

Louis Susman dismisses Lockerbie bomber row as ‘a little spat’ and insists Obama regards UK as ‘our best friend’

Gordon-Brown-Obama

 

(Brian howes) Let me tell you how it really is! Obama asks for more troops from the UK and he gets them, Obama wants Gordon Brown to lick his ASS and Giordon Brown is happy to do so. Obama increases security in US airports so Gordon Brown has to follow! Obama says keep all wrong doings in the Iraq war secret and Gordon Bronw say yes sir!

The UK is a puppet to US policy and The UK no longer have any say in policy. Gordon Brown do us a favour and Die.

‘Best friends’ Gordon Brown and Barack Obama discuss policy in the Oval office. Britain’s special relationship with the United States is “stronger than ever” under Barack Obama, the American ambassador to London said today.

There has been speculation that Obama’s foreign policy approach – and his personal history of his grandfather being tortured by British colonial authorities during the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya – might lead to a cooler relationship than was the case when his predecessor George Bush and Tony Blair went to war together in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Louis Susman insisted that Obama regards the UK as “our most important ally and our best friend” and dismissed the recent row over the liberation of the Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi as “a little spat” of the kind that occurs in any happy marriage.

Susman said Washington had not ruled out following Britain in imposing taxes on bankers’ salaries, after the announcement by the chancellor Alistair Darling of a one-off 50% levy which some commentators suggested would drive high-fliers to relocate from London to alternative financial centres such as New York.

In an interview with BBC Radio 4′s The World At One Susman dismissed any suggestion of a cooling in relations since Obama took office a year ago. “I think the special relationship, as we normally define it, is stronger than ever,” he said.

“With the previous relationship, Mr Blair and Mr Bush had not only a governmental relationship but a very personal relationship – it was more like thinking with the same mind all the time – and I think we are going through some of that now, watching the British inquiry into the lead-up to Iraq.

“President Obama considers the UK our most important ally and our best friend. He constantly expresses … our appreciation for the sacrifice which you are making right now in Afghanistan and the bravery and courage of your soldiers who are dying alongside our soldiers.

“When you look at it in terms of intelligence, we share so much of our intelligence with each other to do counter-terrorism. If you look at it militarily, we are moving forward potentially on joint procurement, joint exercises, joint efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“When you look at it in terms of economics and how we are trying in the financial institutions and what we did through the G20 in global co-ordination to stop this terrible recession, I think it is very, very strong.”

Asked about US anger over the decision to allow Megrahi to return to Libya because of his terminal cancer, Susman said: “The special relationship is very strong. It is like a strong marriage. Every once in a while you have a little spat.

“This was a spat. This was a case where friends can disagree.”

He laughed off calls from some US figures for a boycott of Scottish products, saying he still drank Scotch whisky, visited Scottish golf courses and wore Scottish sweaters.

Susman also rejected claims that Obama had failed to consult Nato allies over his decision to increase US troop numbers in Afghanistan by 30,000, saying there was “immense consultation” with Britain, France and other alliance members.

He said environmentalists were wrong to accuse Obama of preventing an ambitious climate change deal at last month’s Copenhagen summit by failing to come forward with an improved offer for US greenhouse gas emission cuts or put a figure on how much America was prepared to contribute to a $100bn (£62bn) global fund to help poorer countries adapt.

Both these issues were matters for congress to approve and it would have been inappropriate for the president to commit himself without first securing its backing, he said.

However, he said: “Every participant in that conference knew when America says we will pay our share of the $100bn, we will pay our share.”

Susman said Gordon Brown had been “a leader” alongside Obama and others in guiding the world out of recession. And he appeared to hold out the possibility that Obama may consider a tax on bankers’ bonuses to match Darling’s 50% levy on those over £25,000.

“In terms of the tax on bonuses, I think we are looking at everything and we are going to have to see how the financial community conducts itself,” he said.

“I’m not sure what we might do. I would only suggest that the G20 talked about deferred compensation and clawbacks and they expect people to act reasonably. We are waiting to see if people act reasonably. We have to keep our options open.”

Blog at WordPress.com.