UK Citizens Extradition Fight

August 24, 2008

Helping People is a selfless act By Brian Howes

Filed under: News — Brian Howes @ 5:04 pm
Tags: , , ,

I have come to the conclusion that some people who say they are helping you are not,  in my case my wife and I are facing extradition to the US and losing our four girls and our baby born in an Arizona desert.

If being helped takes away a person’s right to his opinion then whether there help is genuine must also be put in Question.

If after being “helped” you give an opinion and that person who helped then takes the opposing view that you are now what he was previously defending.

This just strengthens my view that the help was motivated by something I will not comment on here, But when I help anybody I do not expect them to stop having their own thoughts and opinions nor do I change my strong views because a person tells me an opinion that I do not like.

Shame on you Ross Hemsworth and you will surely turn even further away now as I have made another opinion that you will not like and maybe you will be an extradition supporter soon for my wife and me, or maybe you already are.

One more thing before I shut up before the almighty Ross Hemsworth turns his radio station against my family and that is you were happy to talk rubbish and bend the truth on blogs that you instigated but your own blog is well moderated as you only accept opinions that are close to your own.

Ross Hemsworth you are not the man you try to portray and you should listen to the interview I gave you and there was no mention of suicide pact in the context that you have put forward in blogs.

You could get some street cred by stop telling people how much you say you have done for others. (The truth hurts) LOL

Ross Hemsworth I will be shaking in my boots (not) while I wait to see what you will do next to damage my extradition fight.

I think Ross is probably well liked but he is now going to sing the praises of Jacqui Smith over extradition or retract what he said in our defence on the offending blog?

Does Ross have an opinion he can stick to? Or is his opinion so fragile that they are determined by others who make observations.

Happy Christmas Ross and a prosperous New Year.

Try not to exaggerate taking the Government to court to much as the firm of lawyers are only giving advice for £5,000 and not even saying the Government can be taken to court over the extradition treaty are they?

August 19, 2008

Evidence, Uncut The US Spies OnThe World

Filed under: News,Politics — Brian Howes @ 9:25 pm

05.22.06

 

AT&T whistle-blower Mark Klein says this secret room in an AT&T switching center is home to data-mining equipment that can spy on internet communications.

Former AT&T technician Mark Klein is the key witness in the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s class-action lawsuit against the telecommunications company, which alleges that AT&T cooperated in an illegal National Security Agency domestic surveillance program.

In a public statement Klein issued last month, he described the NSA’s visit to an AT&T office. In an older, less-public statement recently acquired by Wired News, Klein goes into additional details of his discovery of an alleged surveillance operation in an AT&T building in San Francisco.

Klein supports his claim by attaching excerpts of three internal company documents: a Dec. 10, 2002, manual titled “Study Group 3, LGX/Splitter Wiring, San Francisco,” a Jan. 13, 2003, document titled “SIMS, Splitter Cut-In and Test Procedure” and a secondCut-In and Test Procedure” dated Jan. 24, 2003.

Here we present Klein’s statement in its entirety, with inline links to all of the document excerpts where he cited them. You can also download the complete file here (pdf). The full AT&T documents are filed under seal in federal court in San Francisco.


AT&T’s Implementation of NSA Spying on American Citizens

31 December 2005

I wrote the following document in 2004 when it became clear to me that AT&T, at the behest of the National Security Agency, had illegally installed secret computer gear designed to spy on internet traffic. At the time I thought this was an outgrowth of the notorious Total Information Awareness program, which was attacked by defenders of civil liberties. But now it’s been revealed by The New York Times that the spying program is vastly bigger and was directly authorized by President Bush, as he himself has now admitted, in flagrant violation of specific statutes and constitutional protections for civil liberties. I am presenting this information to facilitate the dismantling of this dangerous Orwellian project.


AT&T Deploys Government Spy Gear on WorldNet Network

– 16 January, 2004

In 2003 AT&T built “secret rooms” hidden deep in the bowels of its central offices in various cities, housing computer gear for a government spy operation which taps into the company’s popular WorldNet service and the entire internet. These installations enable the government to look at every individual message on the internet and analyze exactly what people are doing. Documents showing the hardwire installation in San Francisco suggest that there are similar locations being installed in numerous other cities.

The physical arrangement, the timing of its construction, the government-imposed secrecy surrounding it and other factors all strongly suggest that its origins are rooted in the Defense Department’s Total Information Awareness (TIA) program which brought forth vigorous protests from defenders of constitutionally protected civil liberties last year:

“As the director of the effort, Vice Adm. John M. Poindexter, has described the system in Pentagon documents and in speeches, it will provide intelligence analysts and law enforcement officials with instant access to information from internet mail and calling records to credit card and banking transactions and travel documents, without a search warrant.” The New York Times, 9 November 2002

To mollify critics, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) spokesmen have repeatedly asserted that they are only conducting “research” using “artificial synthetic data” or information from “normal DOD intelligence channels” and hence there are “no U.S. citizen privacy implications” (Department of Defense, Office of the Inspector General report on TIA, December 12, 2003). They also changed the name of the program to “Terrorism Information Awareness” to make it more politically palatable. But feeling the heat, Congress made a big show of allegedly cutting off funding for TIA in late 2003, and the political fallout resulted in Adm. Poindexter’s abrupt resignation last August. However, the fine print reveals that Congress eliminated funding only for “the majority of the TIA components,” allowing several “components” to continue (DOD, ibid). The essential hardware elements of a TIA-type spy program are being surreptitiously slipped into “real world” telecommunications offices.

In San Francisco the “secret room” is Room 641A at 611 Folsom Street, the site of a large SBC phone building, three floors of which are occupied by AT&T. High-speed fiber-optic circuits come in on the 8th floor and run down to the 7th floor where they connect to routers for AT&T’s WorldNet service, part of the latter’s vital “Common Backbone.” In order to snoop on these circuits, a special cabinet was installed and cabled to the “secret room” on the 6th floor to monitor the information going through the circuits. (The location code of the cabinet is 070177.04, which denotes the 7th floor, aisle 177 and bay 04.) The “secret room” itself is roughly 24-by-48 feet, containing perhaps a dozen cabinets including such equipment as Sun servers and two Juniper routers, plus an industrial-size air conditioner.

The normal work force of unionized technicians in the office are forbidden to enter the “secret room,” which has a special combination lock on the main door. The telltale sign of an illicit government spy operation is the fact that only people with security clearance from the National Security Agency can enter this room. In practice this has meant that only one management-level technician works in there. Ironically, the one who set up the room was laid off in late 2003 in one of the company’s endless “downsizings,” but he was quickly replaced by another.

Plans for the “secret room” were fully drawn up by December 2002, curiously only four months after Darpa started awarding contracts for TIA. One 60-page document, identified as coming from “AT&T Labs Connectivity & Net Services” and authored by the labs’ consultant Mathew F. Casamassima, is titled Study Group 3, LGX/Splitter Wiring, San Francisco and dated 12/10/02. This document addresses the special problem of trying to spy on fiber-optic circuits. Unlike copper wire circuits which emit electromagnetic fields that can be tapped into without disturbing the circuits, fiber-optic circuits do not “leak” their light signals. In order to monitor such communications, one has to physically cut into the fiber somehow and divert a portion of the light signal to see the information.

This problem is solved with “splitters” which literally split off a percentage of the light signal so it can be examined. This is the purpose of the special cabinet referred to above: Circuits are connected into it, the light signal is split into two signals, one of which is diverted to the “secret room.” The cabinet is totally unnecessary for the circuit to perform — in fact it introduces problems since the signal level is reduced by the splitter — its only purpose is to enable a third party to examine the data flowing between sender and recipient on the internet.

The above-referenced document includes a diagram showing the splitting of the light signal, a portion of which is diverted to “SG3 Secure Room,” i.e., the so-called “Study Group” spy room. Another page headlined “Cabinet Naming” lists not only the “splitter” cabinet but also the equipment installed in the “SG3″ room, including various Sun devices, and Juniper M40e and M160 “backbone” routers. PDF file 4 shows one of many tables detailing the connections between the “splitter” cabinet on the 7th floor (location 070177.04) and a cabinet in the “secret room” on the 6th floor (location 060903.01). Since the San Francisco “secret room” is numbered 3, the implication is that there are at least several more in other cities (Seattle, San Jose, Los Angeles and San Diego are some of the rumored locations), which likely are spread across the United States.

One of the devices in the “Cabinet Naming” list is particularly revealing as to the purpose of the “secret room”: a Narus STA 6400. Narus is a 7-year-old company which, because of its particular niche, appeals not only to businessmen (it is backed by AT&T, JP Morgan and Intel, among others) but also to police, military and intelligence officials. Last November 13-14, for instance, Narus was the “Lead Sponsor” for a technical conference held in McLean, Virginia, titled “Intelligence Support Systems for Lawful Interception and Internet Surveillance.” Police officials, FBI and DEA agents, and major telecommunications companies eager to cash in on the “war on terror” had gathered in the hometown of the CIA to discuss their special problems. Among the attendees were AT&T, BellSouth, MCI, Sprint and Verizon. Narus founder, Dr. Ori Cohen, gave a keynote speech. So what does the Narus STA 6400 do?

“The (Narus) STA Platform consists of standalone traffic analyzers that collect network and customer usage information in real time directly from the message…. These analyzers sit on the message pipe into the ISP (internet service provider) cloud rather than tap into each router or ISP device” (Telecommunications magazine, April 2000). A Narus press release (1 Dec., 1999) also boasts that its Semantic Traffic Analysis (STA) technology “captures comprehensive customer usage data … and transforms it into actionable information…. (It) is the only technology that provides complete visibility for all internet applications.”

To implement this scheme, WorldNet’s high-speed data circuits already in service had to be rerouted to go through the special “splitter” cabinet. This was addressed in another document of 44 pages from AT&T Labs, titled SIMS, Splitter Cut-In and Test Procedure, dated 01/13/03. “SIMS” is an unexplained reference to the secret room. Part of this reads as follows:

“A WMS (work) Ticket will be issued by the AT&T Bridgeton Network Operation Center (NOC) to charge time for performing the work described in this procedure document…. “This procedure covers the steps required to insert optical splitters into select live Common Backbone (CBB) OC3, OC12 and OC48 optical circuits.”

The NOC referred to is in Bridgeton, Missouri, and controls WorldNet operations. (As a sign that government spying goes hand-in-hand with union-busting, the entire (Communication Workers of America) Local 6377 which had jurisdiction over the Bridgeton NOC was wiped out in early 2002 when AT&T fired the union work force and later rehired them as nonunion “management” employees.) The cut-in work was performed in 2003, and since then new circuits are connected through the “splitter” cabinet.

Another Cut-In and Test Procedure document dated January 24, 2003, provides diagrams of how AT&T Core Network circuits were to be run through the “splitter” cabinet. One page lists the circuit IDs of key Peering Links which were “cut-in” in February 2003, including ConXion, Verio, XO, Genuity, Qwest, PAIX, Allegiance, AboveNet, Global Crossing, C&W, UUNET, Level 3, Sprint, Telia, PSINet and Mae West. By the way, Mae West is one of two key internet nodal points in the United States (the other, Mae East, is in Vienna, Virginia). It’s not just WorldNet customers who are being spied on — it’s the entire internet.

The next logical question is, what central command is collecting the data sent by the various “secret rooms”? One can only make educated guesses, but perhaps the answer was inadvertently given in the DOD Inspector General’s report (cited above):

“For testing TIA capabilities, Darpa and the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) created an operational research and development environment that uses real-time feedback. The main node of TIA is located at INSCOM (in Fort Belvoir, Virginia).”

Among the agencies participating or planning to participate in the INSCOM “testing” are the “National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, the DOD Counterintelligence Field Activity, the U.S. Strategic Command, the Special Operations Command, the Joint Forces Command and the Joint Warfare Analysis Center.” There are also “discussions” going on to bring in “non-DOD federal agencies” such as the FBI.

This is the infrastructure for an Orwellian police state. It must be shut down!

August 9, 2008

Censorship and the US and UK Government By Brian Howes

My name is Brian Howes and My wife and I are being extradited to the US without evidence.

We have spent 214 days on remand without charge with no evidence or criminal record.

Our four young girls have been traumatises as my wife has.

Every time I put a video on myspace that is against our extradition it is deleted and that means

we no longer have freedom of speech so I am disgusted. We have a petition at www.petition.co.uk if you could sign it.

.

Have a thought for our troops and comments

6:43

<div class=”description” wbr=”true” wbr_swap=”‘”
The Iraq War Horror. The war or invasion is very sad, I feel for all people on both sides of the conflict and especially the children.
[less] ‘>
The Iraq War Horror. The war or invasion is very sad, I feel for all people on both sides of the conflict and especially the … [more]

Added: 01/08/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 43,834
Comments : 30
Rating : 91% (29 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Tony Blair and George Bush on the Weakest Link

2:14
Tony Blair and George Bush on the Weakest Link
Added: 01/08/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 571
Comments : 4
Rating : 90% (3 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Gordon Brown Britain;s Worst Ever Prime Minister

3:17
Gordon Brown Britain’s Worst Ever Prime Minister
Added: 01/08/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 3,809
Comments : 2
Rating : 90% (2 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Gordon Brown picking his nose

1:07
Gordon Brown picking his nose
Added: 31/07/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 153
Comments : 3
Rating : 92% (2 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Bush And Blair Song

1:01
Bush And Blair Song, Comments Please.
Added: 20/06/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 72,245
Comments : 23
Rating : 91% (41 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

4 Banned Commercials! ! HILARIOUS!!!

1:57
4 Banned Commercials!! HILARIOUS!!!
Added: 20/06/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 75,738
Comments : 29
Rating : 96% (89 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

BANNED Video commercial part 1

1:16
BANNED Video commercial part 1
Added: 19/06/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 21,271
Comments : 28
Rating : 94% (51 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

War crimes Bush Blair Gordon Brown

3:28
War crimes Bush Blair Gordon Brown
Added: 19/06/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 38,875
Comments : 33
Rating : 85% (10 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel
<a class=”still” title=”‘For” more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.’ href=”javascript:void(0)”>

this is a sad story

3:40
this is a very sad story
Added: 13/06/2008 | Visibility : Copyright Blocked
Status : Copyright Blocked
For more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.
<a class=”still” title=”‘For” more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.’ href=”javascript:void(0)”>

Sad reflection on the wars waged by Labour and Bush

3:40
Sad reflection on the wars waged by Labour and Bush.

This is a very sad video on the effects of war on innocent people.

Added: 13/06/2008 | Visibility : Copyright Blocked
Status : Copyright Blocked
For more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.
<a class=”still” title=”‘For” more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.’ href=”javascript:void(0)”>

BUSH BLAIR

1:13
BUSH BLAIR
Added: 13/06/2008 | Visibility : Copyright Blocked
Status : Copyright Blocked
For more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.
<a class=”still” title=”‘For” more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.’ href=”javascript:void(0)”>

tony and bush

1:09
tony and bush
Added: 13/06/2008 | Visibility : Copyright Blocked
Status : Copyright Blocked
For more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.
<a class=”still” title=”‘For” more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.’ href=”javascript:void(0)”>

Tony Blair and George Bush Duete Sing Together

1:16
Tony Blair and George Bush Duete Sing Together.
Added: 13/06/2008 | Visibility : Copyright Blocked
Status : Copyright Blocked
For more information, go to the Blocked Media Management page.

Gordon Brown and Tony Blair Parody

2:20
Gordon Brown and Tony Blair Parody
Added: 12/06/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 1,682
Comments : 1
Rating : 92% (1 vote)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Gordon Brown Shaking in Fear

1:18
Gordon Brown Shaking in Fear during a Commons confrontation.
Added: 03/06/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 752
Comments : 6
Rating : 91% (6 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

SAY NO TO 42 DAY DETENTION WITHOUT CHARGE

0:27

<div class=”description” wbr=”true” wbr_swap=”‘”
What would it be like to be locked up for six weeks, without warning and without charge? Under current anti-terror laws you can be detained and questioned by police for up to 28 days without being charged. The Government is proposing to extend this even further, to 42 days. There are alternatives.
[less] ‘>
What would it be like to be locked up for six weeks, without warning and without charge? Under current anti-terror laws you can be … [more]

Added: 03/06/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 89,030
Comments : 13
Rating : 88% (18 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Alex Stone Blind Man Extradition Strory.

4:29

<div class=”description” wbr=”true” wbr_swap=”
Sorry story cut to fit maximum words.
Alex Stone is a blind computer science graduate from south London who had worked for a bank for ten years. In May 2003 he joined an email list for blind people, and started chatting to a woman called Alma from Kansas City. They started talking regularly on the phone as well as emailing each other. After a few months they decided they wanted to meet, so Alex made plans to fly out to Kansas City and spend a holiday with Alma that August.

In 2003, as his friendship with Alma was blossoming, Alex Stone was still blissfully unaware of the world of political treaties. Alex and Alma spent a wonderful fortnight together, and Alex met Alma’s son, one-year-old Zachary. In the light of his new relationship, he decided to take the redundancy offer he’d been made, and to move out to the US to be with Alma: ‘It was exactly what I wanted to do; I wanted to go and live out there and be with her’.

Alex sorted out his life in the UK and flew back to Kansas City in November 2003. He hadn’t been there long when the trouble began. Zachary developed a cold that wouldn’t get better. He was clearly unwell, so Alma’s mother took him to hospital to be looked at. While he was there, the doctors decided to X-ray him, and discovered that both of his arms and both of his legs were broken.

Alma rushed to hospital to be with Zachary, and Alex stayed at home in her apartment. But over the next four or five days, Alex began to feel uncomfortable, and gradually realised that suspicion was falling on him. ‘

Things got worse when a friend of the family came round to the apartment to warn him. The friend said Alma’s family might try to ‘do something stupid’. Feeling threatened, Alex moved out of Alma’s apartment into a motel. Another four days went past and, after no further contact with Alma, the police turned up. He was taken in for questioning and accused of having injured the child. The only other people who could have injured Zachary

Nothing happened for a year. Then, in November 2004, Alex’s neighbour at his old flat phoned to say that three policemen had been knocking at his door. Alex was advised to turn himself in.

Two days later he presented himself at Charing Cross Police Station, where he was arrested and extradition proceedings began.

Over the following months, and several more court appearances, he discovered that he had absolutely no defence under the Extradition Act. Simply by charging Alex with the crime, the US had the right to extradite him. Thanks to David Blunkett’s new law, the British legal system was impotent to protect him. At the end of April 2005, Alex’s family drove him to Gatwick Airport, where he was handed over to the Scotland Yard extradition squad, handcuffed, shackled, and put on a private jet to the US.

Now Alex is living in London and looking for work with a 16- month hole in his CV. ‘It is very difficult to prove you haven’t done.
[less] “>
Sorry story cut to fit maximum words.
Alex Stone is a blind computer science graduate from south London who had worked for a bank for … [more]

Added: 30/05/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 22,434
Comments : 10
Rating : 92% (4 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Funny home video BLOOPERS fun clips part 1

7:46
Funny home video blooppers fun clips part 1. Enjoy!
Added: 28/05/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 25,505
Comments : 38
Rating : 94% (98 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Sheriff Joe Arpaio;s Jail should people be treated this way?

2:15
Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Jail should people be treated this way?
Added: 27/05/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 24,768
Comments : 26
Rating : 94% (16 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

Erin and Denni Singing Every time we touch

3:11
Erin and Denni Singing Every time we touch.
Added: 25/05/2008 | Visibility : Public
Status : Live
Plays : 6,747
Comments : 10
Rating : 86% (22 votes)
Share: Email | Bulletin | Blog
Add to: Profile | Channel

August 7, 2008

Britain’s unfair treaty by Chris Williams

Filed under: Brian Howes,Civil Liberties,Gordon Brown,Human Rights,News,Politics — Brian Howes @ 11:13 am

Britain’s unfair treaty

Chris Williams

Denniandsisters

 Observations on extradition

 

It now seems very likely that Gary McKinnon, the north London UFO enthusiast and conspiracy theorist, will be extradited to the United States to face charges that he hacked into Nasa and military computers. The Law Lords ruled on 30 July that earlier American attempts to press a plea bargain from their suspect had been legal, leaving his defence team with no further recourse to the UK courts.

Lawyers are preparing a last-ditch appeal to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg on the grounds that their client’s curiosity and mischief could attract a disproportionate punishment. Few commentators rate their chances of success highly, however, after the Law Lords argued in their judgment that McKinnon would face a similar fate if tried in the UK.

The McKinnon saga has served to highlight again the troubling impact on justice of the post-9/11 extradition treaty between the UK and the United States. Signed in March 2003 by the then home secretary, David Blunkett, it removed the obligation on US law enforcement to present UK courts with prima facie evidence of criminality. Blunkett said at the time: “This new treaty will mean much closer co-operation and cut out much of the paperwork which has led to unnecessary delays in the current system and allowed criminals to exploit loopholes and deliberately thwart justice.”

The treaty quickly became law without parliamentary debate, thanks to the Royal Prerogative. The “paperwork” – or evidence – formerly required to initiate extradition proceedings to the US is now replaced with a call for “written information” relating to alleged wrongdoing. That information is, in effect, assumed to be true fact.

Brian Howes, 44, and his wife, Kerry-Ann, 30, spent 214 days without charge in Edinburgh’s Saughton Prison last year as a result of that assumption. Their detention lasted more than five times longer than the hotly disputed 42-day limit for terror suspects that squeaked through the Commons in June. Federal prosecutors at the Drug Enforcement Agency in Arizona are aiming to secure their extradition for allegedly supplying chemicals to crystal meth labs. The highly addictive home-made drug has ravaged poor communities across the United States in the past two decades.

The couple, from Bo’ness near Falkirk, were eventually released on bail to care for their four children after Brian Howes spent 30 days on hunger strike. They are now just weeks away from a final high court appeal that could see them packed off to the notorious federal penitentiaries of the Arizona Desert to await trial. Their last hope in the UK is to overturn the June decision by the Scottish justice minister Kenny MacAskill to approve their extradition. A conviction for unlawful importation of regulated chemicals carries a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment and a fine of up to $250,000. The Howeses both face several indictments.

While Gary McKinnon freely admits he hacked US government systems, the Howeses strongly deny they broke the law by selling iodine and red phosphorus. Both have myriad innocent uses and are perfectly legal in the UK, but are strictly controlled by the US administration as part of its international crusade against drugs. Unusually, the investigation was sparked when suspicious Cleveland police contacted US counterparts during a separate, aborted firearms investigation.

Iodine and red phosphorus were two of about 60 substances the Howeses’ business offered for sale on the web, but it is alleged they supplied iodine and red phosphorus knowing that the chemicals would be used to make crystal meth. The couple vehemently dispute that claim, insisting red phosphorus is often bought by amateur pyrotechnics devotees and that the iodine they supplied was clearly marked for medical use. But because of the transatlantic extradition deal, no UK court will ever hear those arguments.

The Howeses have been broken by the battle. A month without food caused lasting damage to Brian Howes’s speech and memory; Kerry-Ann has been diagnosed with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Howes fears conditions in Arizona’s jails, combined with a lengthy wait for the case to be heard, could prove devastating and has several times attempted to strike a plea bargain deal in exchange for his wife’s freedom. Prosecutors have rejected his approaches.

This leaves the Howeses’ inexperienced and under-resourced legal team reduced to battling Washington on points of law. If they are extradited to Arizona, the couple could face a three-year wait for a judge to hear the arguments of their public defender, who has been denied access to important documents detailing the investigation.

Our extradition treaty with Washington is not reciprocal. United States citizens suspected of crimes by UK law enforcement have not lost their right to challenge the evidence presented against them in a home court. The US constitution’s “probable cause” provision meant that not even John Ashcroft, the bête noire of civil liberties advocates, who as attorney general signed the treaty on behalf of the Bush administration, could have torn down this safeguard.

Meanwhile, at the thin end of the deal, the UK authorities must show American courts “such information as would provide a reasonable basis to believe that the person sought committed the offence” – that is, evidence.

 

August 4, 2008

Cleveland and Arizona Extradition Corruption

Cleveland Police through corruption have persicuted my family for six years and this video is the start of our story which going to be told.

This movie requires Adobe Flash for playback.

This was on myspace and received over 50,000 views but was removed like many other without reason.

If you feel extradition without evidence is wrong please sign our petition at www.petition.co.uk

Blog at WordPress.com.