UK
Force faces 286 corruption claims
‘Zero tolerance’ officer Ray Mallon is being investigated
A total of 286 complaints are being investigated in a corruption probe against Cleveland Police.
Some 39 officers are under suspicion as part of the Operation Lancet probe, which began nearly a year ago.
 |
| Suspects have alleged “ritualistic” violence against them |
Eight officers have been suspended, including the former head of Middlesbrough CID. Detective Superintendent Ray Mallon, gained prominence as the architect of ‘zero tolerance’ policing policy on Teesside.
The Police Complaints Authority’s investigation includes allegations of serious assault and intimidation. These involve “almost ritualistic” violence against suspects to extract confessions, as well as minor procedural irregularities.
The inquiry began after a case collapsed at Teesside Crown Court last October when a defendant claimed that officers tried to bribe him with drugs.
There are 43 allegations concerning drugs in the investigation and the PCA has received 11 of these. A remaining 32 are expected over the next few weeks.
‘Hanging out to dry’
In May this year, former president of the Police Superintendents’ Association, Brian Mackenzie urged the PCA to conclude the inquiry as soon as possible.
He said Operation Lancet had lost its way.
He said: “What shouldn’t be happening, is that people like Ray Mallon, who are caught up in the original inquiry should be left hanging out to dry while the last minor inquiry is finalised.”
Supt Mallon, feted by politicians for his tough approach to crime, has strenuously denied any wrongdoing.
Although the allegations are apparently not related to ‘zero tolerance’ it is with this policy Supt Mallon will remain linked in many people’s minds.
‘Robocop’ style
When he was appointed in November 1996, he promised to quit if crime in the area had not gone down by 20% in 18 months.
His tough-cop style earned him the nickname ‘Robocop’.
Reductions in crimes against property in Middlesbrough increased national interest in zero tolerance.
Murder reduction
But Supt Mallon received adverse publicity when he had to suspend two CID officers who allegedly gave a suspect heroin in return for confessions.
Zero tolerance, or ‘positive policing’ as many prefer to call it, originated in New York. A large drop in the city’s murder rate was attributed to the strategy.
It attempts to tackle law-breaking from the bottom up by treating petty crime as seriously as other offences.
This philosophy behind it is known as the ‘broken windows’ theory because its proponents argue even minor vandalism leads to more serious crime.
Brian Howes on Twitter
Howes Family You-Tube
he is a criminal,i know this first hand,07846610325
Comment by neil scott — September 18, 2008 @ 3:48 pm |
cleveland police hide evidence to stop an innocent man getting an award of compensation after he was assaulted in chicago rock cafe,hed had two pints just finished work held in custody for ten and a half hours without medical attention by cleveland police ,the officer(chalmers) states that he couldnt tell the differance between if he was drunk or unconscious
Comment by neil scott — September 18, 2008 @ 3:52 pm |
he isa criminal,like in 95 when he ended up as a defective detective ray mallon hid evidence of a police assault against me under judge fox,doctors records statements,photos he did it again in 2006mattacked in middlesbrough at chicago rock cafe,he allowed bouncers to get away with an assault on me then all dna photographic evidence was lost they even offered me a tenner for the lost dna,cheeky cunts,aND I HAD TO PAY THE POST FOR TI TIO BE DELIVERED TO ME,NOW HE IS KNOWN AS ROBO COPT A DEFECTIVE MAYOR WHO BREACHED COUNCIL RULES AS A PREVIOUS EMPLOYEE TO RUN FOR MAYOR IN MIDDLESBROUGH AND FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMED A MAJORITY VOTE BUT HE IS PAYING THE ASIANS OF BORO TAXIS FOR THAT HE BENT IN EVERY JOB HES DONE ID LOVE TO KNOW WHAT HIS COLLECTION OF CRIMINALS GAVE HIM FOR EVIDENCE AGAINST CASES HE LOST
Comment by neil — October 1, 2008 @ 3:42 pm |
UNDER THE CRB COUNCILS RULES NOONE WITH A BAD CRB WILL BE ALLOWED TO WORK WITH THE VULNERABLE, HOW DO MIDDLESBROUGH COUNCIL EXPECT MIDDLESBROUGHS PEOPLE TO GET AROUND THE FACT THAT RAY MALLON ADMITTED 14 ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION AS A TRUSTED OFFICER,HIS CRB DISCLOSURE IS SO WORSE THAN THE CRIMINALS WHO ALLOWED HIM TO STAND AS MAYOR OF MIDDLESBROUGH
Comment by neil — October 1, 2008 @ 3:45 pm |
THIS MAN UNDER COUNCIL RULES SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO STAND AS MAYOR,HE IS A CRIMINAL,
Comment by neil — October 1, 2008 @ 3:46 pm |
how is it possible that clevland police get a new 6 million pound station with all the up to date latest technology in cctv and patroned by them, in the towns talking camera that shouts at dogs peeing up it,can a police station that has manned police patrolling on an half hour basis as well as the technology, find a dead body in a cell,the 34 year old who was found dead,is this a fluke,is the 740 complaints against cleveland police force that were dispenced with a fluke too,was it a fluke that the very sameallegations wre made to ray mallon in operation lancett costing middlesbrough 6 million thats twelve million middlesbrough has had off the government,and to add insult to injury has anyone else had problems with false and innacurat infornmtion about them in a crb disclosure
Comment by neil scott — October 21, 2008 @ 2:09 pm |
Jun 25 2008 by Simon Walton, Evening Gazette A POLICE watchdog is to take no action over the death of a man who plunged from Teesside flats after officers arrived at his door.
Kevin Frederick Williams, 45, an unemployed labourer, fell to his death from a 12th floor flat in Fleet House in Cargo Fleet Lane, Middlesbrough, on Sunday.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) was notified as Cleveland
Comment by neil scott — October 21, 2008 @ 2:13 pm |
me AND MALLON MET IN A POLICE BUILDING IN SOUTHBANK AFTER I WAS ASSAULTED BY SEVERAL POLICE OFFICERS,me and mallon met in a car park I WAS WITH MY NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOUR I CONFRONTED MALLON ABOUT THAT TIME WHEN HE TREID TO HAVE ME SENT DOWN FOR ASSAULTING A POLICE OFFICER AND WAS THROWN OUT OF COURT BY JUDGE FOX,MY NEIGHBOUR WAS FOUND DEAD IN HIS OWN HOME,ERIC MY MATE,HELPED ME IN A DOMESTIC DISPUTE SO I DIDNT GET INTO TROUBLE AND HE WAS FOUND DEAD AT THE BOTTOM OF HIS STAIRS OPEN INQUEST JUST AT THE TIME POLICE WERE INTIMIDATING EVERYONE I KNEW AND PUTTING WORDS INTO MY EX PARTNERS MOUTH AS STRREETR WARDENS THE FIRST IN BRAMBLES FARM WHEN MY OLD BUD STAN SET ME UP WITH THE COUNCIL ENFORCEMENT TEAM
Comment by neil scott — October 21, 2008 @ 2:20 pm |
Print Document11 March 2009Cleveland Police officer charged following IPCC managed investigationFor Immediate Release
PR 1459 Cleveland Police officer charged following IPCC managed investigation
A Cleveland Police officer has been charged with causing death by careless driving following an Independent Police Complaints Commission managed investigation.
Pc Thomas David Hart, 27, who is based in Stockton, has been charged in relation to a road traffic incident on 18 October 2008 in which a Cleveland Police van responding to an emergency call was in collision with a Peugeot 206 containing a 25-year-old woman and 24-year-old man on the A1032 Tees Bridge Approach Road.
The woman, Aimee Welsh, sustained multiple injuries and died subsequently in hospital on 19 November 2008. The man sustained a fractured eye socket.
Following Ms Welsh’s death the IPCC managed the Cleveland Police investigation into the incident and a file was submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service who determined that criminal charges were appropriate.
Pc Hart will appear before Teesside Magistrates Court on 17 March 2009.
Media contact:
Ian Christon, IPCC Regional Communications Officer (North Region) Tel 07717 851323 Journalists with urgent enquiries outside normal office hours should contact the on-call press officer on 07717 851157
Comment by neil scott — April 24, 2009 @ 12:56 pm |
the courts beleive that if an officer of cleveland police says you committed a crime then the officer is beleiveable even though as an officer he cannot produce evidence of that crime so as an alleged criminal in cleveland the courts in cleveland convict you on hearsay evidence which is against anyones human rights
Comment by neil scott — April 24, 2009 @ 12:58 pm |
Chief Superintendent Ian Johnston explains why the Police can not be trusted
On BBC Radio 4 this morning on the Today programme, Chief Superintendent Ian Johnston, was interviewed about the question of declining public confidence in the Police Force.
Whilst brief, the interview gave Johnston, who is the President of the Superintendents’ Association of England and Wales, an opportunity to put defend against the accusation being made, about declining confidence and what, if anything the Police intended to do about it.
He concedes that the proposition is probably correct. He puts an emphasis on the politicisation of the police force. He added that politicians are far too involved in policing, but didn’t attempt to suggest a solution, merely accepting this as a fact of life.
While many people may already feel we live in a Police State, others would say this is untrue. However when we have a Senior Police Officer commenting that the politicisation of the Police Force is a fact of life, there can be little doubt that we are heading towards a Police State, in which the Police Force are directly run by the Government.
In a similar vein the Government are making inroads into control of the Judiciary. Fairly recently Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones, decided that the release of intelligence information in the case of Binyam Mohamed, would put the public of the United Kingdom at risk. The decision has been clearly acknowledged as being due to political influence.
The conversation then turned towards the public face of the police and in particular the aspect of police behaviour and apologies for mistakes.
Here Johnston showed that the Police really don’t care about their public service, or public perception.
Comment by neil scott — April 24, 2009 @ 1:00 pm |
An introduction to the IPCCThe Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) was established under the legislation of the police Reform Act 2002 and began work on. 1 April 2004. …the same time ray mallon came to power as a criminal mayor 400 allegations 14 admitted
Comment by neil scott — April 24, 2009 @ 1:02 pm |
England) articles > November 2007
300% RISE; Complaints upheld against police soar.(News)
Article from:Evening Gazette (Middlesbrough, England) Article date:November 15, 2007 | Copyright informationCOPYRIGHT 2007 MGN Ltd. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. (Hide copyright information)
Byline: By SIMON WALTON
COMPLAINTS upheld against Cleveland Police officers have risen by nearly 300% in the last year.
There were 264 complaint investigations completed on Teesside in 2006-2007, compared to 133 in the previous 12 months.
Sixty of the complaints investigated in 2006-2007 were substantiated – nearly triple the previous year’s figure of 21.
Out of the 60 upheld complaints 26 were for “neglect or failure” in duty, nine were for “incivility” …
Read all of this article with a FREE trial
Comment by neil scott — April 24, 2009 @ 1:03 pm |
brown the failed mp as was blair but it didnt stop them from getting the citizens of middlesbrough suffering at the hands of ray mallon,his efforts helped by those in power and the house of lords,by pilot schemes that help police,government officials abuse peoples rights to live,lost evidence data discs from hospitals and cleveland police force,death in the cells of a brandnew police station patrolled evry half hour,748 complaints from the public,crime still the same as2003 when he first was elected ,his election was the biggestsczam in the country votes addapted to suit him,asians votes by majority for favours,asbo al;legations without evidence judges bend the laws to suit citizens treat without evidence as criminals before any cases unravealed,prosecutions without evidence ,the gazette do nothing to help and solicitors bend to the laws as if told to do so or payed to do so,noone is saqfe in a town where the biggest crime is that a criminal is at the front of more crime against its citizens with flawed plans of the government lead firstly by blair passed on to ray mallon ,mallon is being for 6 years given a free hand to do as he pleases,could he get away with murder,has he got away with murder,too manysingle men who deserved a LIFE HAVE DIED WITHOUT INVESTIGATIONS FROM ITS POLICE FORCE,starved of entitlements to life could be one of those reasons
Comment by neil scott — May 7, 2009 @ 10:21 pm |
RAY MALLON CRIMINAL MAYOR OF MIDDLESBROUGH ABUSED CHILDRENS RIGHTS IN MIDDLESBROUGH,NOW HE WANTS ALL CRIMINALS TO BE PUBLICISED I HOPE RAY MALLON IS THE FIRST CRIMINAL CHEIF SUPERINTENDANT, DEFECTIVE DETECTIVE, TO DO SO, NOTHING TO HIDE MALLON,SEE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN LIES TURN TO MORE LIES LIKE 1994 IN THE CASE OF ASSAULTING A POLICE OFFICER
Comment by NEIL SCOTT — November 24, 2009 @ 6:42 pm |
sacked for a crime i did not do,before a court date,
Comment by neil scott — December 2, 2009 @ 5:38 pm |
labour worstens the rights to live policies in england by allowing a criminal to police after filed as a defective detective cheif superintendant at clevel;and police force with his crb disclosure he should never have been allowed to be mayor of a town the worst town in england where a mayor states CRIME DOES NOT PAY when cllearly through the inapt liability of the councils officials when allowing a criminal as mayor states CRIME DOES PAY
Comment by neil scott — December 2, 2009 @ 5:41 pm |
ive always stated in everything ive put on the internet,against ray mallon and police in middlesbrough that what has happened to me IS an ABUSE OF ATHOURITY allowed to be administered by any part of middlesbroughs government offices,im not against police ,or anti police ,but ever since i met ray mallon ,the circustances were that id been assaulted by 8 police officers whilst in cells after being arretsed for breach of thepeace my mam wouldnt let me get cleaned up after release she took me straight to the station and to make a complaint to the superior of officers which dissapointedly remained ray mallon,he stated he was the top gaff,cheif super,at southbank station,photos and statements were took of my injuries,he stated that no evidence of an incident had been reported to him by his custody sargent last night,yet the same sargent reported to a court case that whilst on active duty he sustained 2 broken ribs and didnt know until after two weeks,,i went to court for assaulting a police officer,the charge of breach of the peace was dropped,i was never re arrested for assaulting an officer,i was found to be not guilty by a criown court case with judge fox,the officer made claims to compensation and invited me along which i ignored ,as advised,
*ray mallon admitted to 14 out of 400 offences and now his criminal record has been cleared by police and cps in middlesbrough is this true he is going to become the conservatives police spokesman,in my case ,over 8 years of interferance with evidence witnesses,falsified evidence and often mistakes made by officers lead to a disposal of an amount of allegations towards criminal activity,21 arrests,UNCONVICTED IN ALL, in total,not about any other persons involved ,just me,NO OTHERS WERE SOUGHT,the police corruption allegations in operation lancett enquiree,offered the public 14 out of 400 alegations ADMITTED by ray mallon,mayor of middlesbrough yet at court 13 may 10 ,NO RECORD of offences exsist by cps in middlesbrough, in my case all allegations were given out to the public and employers to render me unemployable in middlesbrough,in my crb disclosure,which lead me to apply to the court of human rights ,why am i different to him,what makes this man who failed everything given as an oportunity to him be seen so different,how did he get help to removal of disclosures after he abused children in his care as an officer of the law,after he gave children as young as 12 drugs for information,
*in all 21` cases of allegations of offences all except one this one,found to be unfounded ,im suffering serious depravation because of the continuous allegations of offences leads to my pcv bus licence,to stop me working as a bus driver,as i have to have a crb disclosure check for every application i made,i had a speeding allegation ,that lead to a conviction directed at my crb disclosure and my bus licence,this was quashed at court,upon appeal,the officer knowingly gave false allegation towards this conviction of points and a £350 fine,on my first offence,the officer stated that id been travelling down marske road on redcar beach,from the roundabout to the officers parked vehicle,at 60 mph,at a distance of 192 metres he showed testimony only that id been speeding ,i appealed and an investigator stated that this is not true,the distance from the roundabout to where the officer was is 360meters,the officer was shown to be incorrect,he was warned of the consequences of his testimony by the investigator,ouitside the appeal court,the officer therefore didnt attend court,and the case was quashed,not leaving it there,i put in a complaint to ipcc,they organised professional standards ex police officers to investigate my complaint,this they did and found that the police officer stated he had made a mistake in the distances from the roundabout to where the officer was parked,which is linked to the home office device lti2020 being defective, to be 192 miles,i then put to ipcc in another appeal to the professional standards conclusion of ,not upheld complaint,and the ipcc came bace with the same result as not upheld complaint,the officer made a mistake,too many mistakes or wilfull misconduct,?
*chicago rock nightclub 27,08,06,working as a limo driver i dropped my passengers off at dickens inn,went to southbank to drop the car off ,walked to my home and got a taxi to the town for a pint,at 11pm,i told the passengers at dickens inn they could pick up there camera at mine tommorrow they had left in my limo,walked down southfeild road,linthorpe road,albert road to the first pub ,had a pint in there,went to chicago rock cafe,had a pint and was assaulted by someone which gave me a broken jaw,injured grion,i found myself in a cell after 11 hours in pain i asked to speak to a doctor and at 130 pm he came after 10 minutes he left and i was released on bail to attend the hospital,who stated on the day i had no injuries,after six weeks, my doctor stated that id had a fractured jaw,my groin took 3years to be exposed as a problem that needed help,i put a claim for compensation in to cica,police apposed it to solicitors and cica that no incident took place and police will be apposing my claim for compensation,i reported on 28,08,06 that id been assaulted,gave her my dna contained tshirt ,that she had ordered destroyed on 19 sept 06, sgt cook dealt with it,she went to the wrong address to conclude her investigations,issac wilsons on linthorpe road middlesbrough,for chicago rock incident in which her undertstudy officer charmers had arrested me for criminal damage for 27,08,06,i was facing a court case of criminal damage for the incident in which id been locked up for for 11 hours and denied medical attention,this is the station that got pulled down,the complaint to ipcc on every occasion was not upheld until after 4 years of complaints which lead to an upheld verdict of false arrest and detention,thjey also put it in my crb disclosure for the 4 yrs as criminal damage,when i went to court no witnesses that had made the allegations of crim dam turned up at court to testify that id did anything wrong, and without evidence of an offence, the courts bound me over for 6 mths,this was to destroy my crb disclosure,with the rights to do so ,the cctv footage of holdings /custody,lost tshirt,at station went missing to show unconsciousness at the time of arrest,300am 27,08,06,no evidence of being drunk at the scene was given to ipcc,could the police tell the differance between a person who is drunk or unconscoius,how could i proove that an offence took place so i continued my pursuit to ipcc,i attended the hearing at the cica tribunal with my witness,was given £3300 for my jaw injuries,and my groin injury was ignored which has recently another compensation claim hasd gone in to cica,for the same l aim that they did not deal with at first instance and never asked for it ,i sent a claim for it again after i sent back the original admittance and ok for the check to be sent to me for 3300,which i had receipts for,for post recorded delivery,cicadidnt know this,,again,the officer cook who apposed my every claim, stated that at the tribunal ” an offence of assault did take place,”
*to date the officers of cleveland police have not offered an appology or compensation for inproper disclosures in my personal crb disclosure for the criminal damage,holding me in cells for 11hours,and deniel of medical assistance,which is against my human rights as an innocent person,false arrest and detention,this was given as the police did make another mistake by ipcc,there excuse this time was;;;
As previously explained, an administrative error had meant that the police did not believe that any further work was necessary in relation to your complaint. I addressed this situation on 21 April 2010 and made them aware that part of your complaint still required attention, so effectively the period of ‘inactivity’ on your complains runs from that date. I, therefore, expect that you will be contacted by the police force shortly.
********************************************************************************************************
my father had previously been arrested for having no mot on his new car,he had had it done the day before,we went to stockton for a mornings walk,had breakfast in the town,we came back to find a stolen car on my front,a little way from my garden,the police came over and asked if we had seen anything,we had just came back from stockton how could we,the officer must have been on my front longer than me,i said no and didnt want to know,went inthen my fathjer was arretsed outside my front and marched past my home with handcuffs on him at 56 years old,intimidation tactics i put it down too,
*******************************************;;
criminal allegations of burglary
evidence to date at court and statements given at court,for burglary,
*three blood samples,
*trainers matching samba
were found at the schene
*NO CUTS to my hands were found on the day of my arrest,linked to any form of dna found at the scene
*no paint was found inside my home next door to the damaged property
*no paint was found on any of my clothes found to connect me to a damaged house full to the brim of paint spread all over walls,ceilings,doors,windows,
my crowbar taken from my home on 23 march ,was never conclusive towards a connection to me being near the damaged property,not by police or forensics
*paint found on a radiator in the passage of the damaged house was dry,yet the house had damage tothe ceilings in all rooms which contained water dage from pipes,radiators pulled from the walls,,toilets smashed, that were all damaged upstairs,
*in a room full to the brim of splashed paint of various kinds,were found, in the damaged house next door to me,one clean door in the middle of the room of splashed paint was found
,with one footprint of a samba shoe
*at court no record of paint samples were found on the trainers that was taken either from my home or the property of 155 marshall ave
*i was arrested for the same offence twice,they stated that id been arretsed for the same amount of £50,000 damage for the second offence,this was dropped,i have a copy of the search warrent as 155 milbrook ave,this was not mentioned at court,my solicitor stated it was not to be mentioned,dont know why this to me would have shown to be false allegation and contempt also interferance with the course of justice
*3 samples of blood dna sg3 sg4 sg5 was delivered by pacey to hq ladgate lane to milner,milner only receives sg4 dna sample of blood,
*recent court appearance to show corruption still exsists in cleveland force,was the allegations of 21 witnesses,all 21 unfounded allegations when brought to court,this case only 1 found guilty of burglary,this case,
*i was arrested twice for the same offence,my neighbour was interveiwed by the police too
*i used every chance of getting myself recorded as to my complaints when i found something unusual over 35 to ipcc,all not upheld except one ,when i was a victim of a crime,assaulted,unconscious i was left in a cell to die for 11 hours,denied medical help,broken jawgrion injury was denied,conteracted by police on my claim for compensation for 4 years,finally allowed me £3500 after the arretsting officer staed i was a victim of a crime ,even though she ordered evidence removed and distroyed,ipcc upheld my complaint and no responce to date hjas been given by the cheif of police,in evidence for the past towards they have donne it before and lost evidence in a case of corruption,
*blood shown to the jury was contaminated with paint or it was all paint,
*witness admits entry to the damaged house on a number of occasions at court,3 dna samples were delivered to milner and only one dna sample was received after transit to hq,2 samples were unexplained as to where they were
*i have been arretsted 21 times, unconnvicted, throughout a 8 year period,the same amount of time mallon spent as mayor of cleveland police officers
*trainers said to be taken from my home were taken in statements at the wrong address of 155 marshal ave this was seen as a mistake,was it a mistake,or did the officer state in his statements that of which was on his mind at the time,23march 09.
*an officer,green, stated on the court stand that the station at northormesby was unsafe as to sealed forensics lab anyone with a key for the old police station could gain access,
*the dc officer states in his statement,that he had the dna samples ion 23 march when on 22 march they were sent to northormsby forensics lab,
*dc officer states in his statement that the blood dna found by him and was sent by him to lab, was a concluded sample connecting to me on 23 march 09,he also states that on the 23 march the dna found on the radiator was mine,before a verdict from forensics in his statements,
*forensics connected dna samples against me on 7 october, 7 months later,
*pacey delivered samples of dna on the day my blood was taken off me at the station by a none doctor,a security guard,no cctv footage was given or allowed to be given by cps for our defence after being asked for it
*no help was given to my barrister for evidence of corrupt officers in operation lancett,in connection with officers connected to my case,it was refused
*crawford had a chance to meet with pacey on 23march,enter my home and falsify the facts as to trainers and dna
*evidence went to billingham after hq ladgate lane noone knew how or why,no excuse was given by police to this court, why it ended up in billingham ,although pacey delivered it to northormesby in her new court uncategorised statements,
*two officers involved in my arrest,one officer gave statements to court,same officer enters my home on his own,without the other officers involvement,took a pair of trainers from 155 marshal ave, the mistake he states, as i live at 155 palister ave,
*dna found at the scene was contaminated by others walking throughout the property
no fingerprints were found at the scene, yet blood was, according to officer crawford,
all evidence was contaminated and not sealed as it was removed by others on a number of occasions
officer in court stated that anyone with knowledge could enter the forensics lab
*no motive was established behond reasonable doubt that i was to blame for a £50,000 damage spree at court hearing on 13 may10
office dc crawford was the only officer out of two officers to give statements to this court,why,did he want nothing to do with this case,
*crawford states he looked into the front of the window at the damaged property,and never went into the house ,why,the window was barred from veiw by brown venishion blinds,he omitted to state this to the court,my neighbours agree to this and the petrons from the club who also veiwed the property damage
*hump it and dump it removed all the damaged articles from the house on 23 march,
forensics were still collecting all evidence from the house to date 24 march 09,
* no record of paint,sampled from the trainers given to court were conclusively given towards the damaged house and paint thrown all over the inside of it were given to court by forensics
*no cctv footage of the police station when my blood was taken off me by a civilian, was allowed to be given by cps or police in this case
*new witness statements not previously given to court were read out in court ,
*crawford had the motive to see that id been blamed for this offence,quota to meet,as a police dc
*the house owner had more motive to do the damage or pay someone to damage the property
* then i was found guilty by a jury
Comment by neil scott — May 14, 2010 @ 2:49 pm |
kumar dead did he get killed or did he die of an heart attack,di he receive a griion injury ,that does not show for 3years,depravation,
Comment by neil scott — May 26, 2010 @ 1:14 pm |